Christopher King

Lesh.

What do agencies normally make? Fifteen percent? Twenty? I know so little about the "biz" that I don't even know. And I couldn't care less.

But whatever it is, why so much? Agents don't do anything. They can't even respond to email inquiries.

I'll tell you what: Should the day come that you want to try running with the big boys and you decide that you'd like to represent me, I'll hold no grudges. Every day is a new day for me. All is forgiven when I lie down each night.

So should that day come, I'll go ahead and give your agency five percent.

At no time will any agent of mine ever make more than five percent. They can't even perform the most basic of functions.

This is why my side wins:

Many currently working within the opposing political structure secretly cannot stand it. They despise the evil they work for. They're decent and they're beautiful and they celebrate life. They will defect at the first opportunity to build something better than the sickness in which they've become ensnared.

The opposing structure is absolutely full of defectors. That mess will fall like a house of cards.

Every last person working in that sweatshop is decent enough and beautiful enough to work elsewhere.

And if it's a paycheck you need --just like everyone-- we can see to that, too. We'll just take the resources of that structure and use it for ourselves. I am a practical man. I'm not opposed to spreading the wealth.

So come where you're appreciated.

Mullen.

Did you talk to your Generals yet?

The fight's coming soon. Watch my back.

When they finally get up the gumption to throw down, we're gonna pick it up and clean their ever-lovin' clocks with it.

It sure would be nice if someone were to see to my house.

I don't have the temperament for dealing with such things. I would like to remain living here, though.

Perhaps you can have one of your New York Hebe lawyers deal with it while I work to prevent the Burntest Offering.

Craig Armstrong - Escape

Here we go.

Teabaggers attack Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel

by John Aravosis (DC) on 11/08/2009 12:20:00 PM

The photo below is of Elie Wiesel in the Buchenwald concentration camp. He's in the second row from the bottom, seventh from the left (next to the wood support).



Holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel criticized a Teabagger protester in Washington, DC this week who held up a sign showing dead bodies from the Dachau concentration camp stacked in a pile, and compared this to the Democrats' health care reform plan. Here are a few of the Teabaggers' responses to Weisel, posted on Politico:

...

Rothschilds nothing! Everyone knows that Obama is George Soros sock puppet. Wasn't Soros Jewish once upon a time? May the Schwartz be with you.

The jews need to clam up and accept the fact that they are in a Chritian country.

This hollowcost thing is totally overblown by the jewish.

...

Rothschild sign? Well its factually true. They were one of the primary families involved in founding the Federal Reserve and are still in it up to their necks. Obama, Bush, and every president since Wilson have done as the Fed told them. Since it a valid historical fact that this family was involved in creating and still has ownership of a substantial piece of the Federal Reserve (but nobody seems to know how much), I guess its now Anti- Semitic to discuss anything a Jew does critically? This guy is a Hebrew Al Sharpton.

http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/teabaggers-attack-holocaust-survivor.html

In the photo shown above, the man seventh from the left on the second row is represented to be Elie Wiesel. We already know that Elie Wiesel is a known liar and fabulist. His entire history is a fraud. I cannot find them right now, but I posted excerpts from some magazine with an expose on his show business exploits peddling Operation Apple Toss.

There is some question whether the man in the photo is Wiesel:

Miklos Gruner and "Elie Wiesel" are in the most famous Holocaust Picture, taken at Buchenwald on April 16, 1945. Gruner is the boy at the extreme left on the bottom row, while "Wiesel" is 7th from left, middle row.  "Wiesel" looks pretty old to be born in 1928, i.e 17 years old. Compare with Miklos Gruner who was 16. According to Gruner this man is not Lazar Wiesel or Elie Wiesel. He implies neither Lazar Wiesel nor Elie Wiesel are this picture.

http://www.henrymakow.com/translated_from_the_hungarian.html

Wiesel is a con artist. His job is to milk the Holocaust for all it's worth. The Holocaust is the Hive Mind's most precious possession. (I took it away from them, though, and I put it in the pretty little locket of trophies I hang around my neck. Possessing the Holofraud is fun. The Frauducaust. Call me a denier all you want. It's actually in my job description. See how it works with comedians?)

"Our purpose was to document the event." Israel's involvement in 9-11 was a tactical error because it grants everyone permission to lift the hood on the belching jalopy called the Jewish Experience, wave away the smoke, and get a good look at the bailing wire and the duct tape holding that improbable mess together.

Do you remember that rube who came into the gas station and said, "Hitler should have killed all the Jews?" He said this in reply to my informing him that Israel was involved in 9-11. But he had been reading the coloring book version of the history text. His understanding of history is not sophisticated enough to know that Hitler was an employee of bankers. Those bankers had three purposes with their German adventure: implement their eugenics goals, execute a religious imperative that certain Talmud-rejecting garbage be disposed of, and cobble together the perceived moral authority for the establishment of Israel. "All the Jews in Poland are worth less than one cow in Palestine." It was best that the ignorami be offered up in a pagan human sacrifice for this perceived greater good. And what a glorious Burnt Offering it was...

Israelis aren't as bright as they think they are. One of the reasons why Jews were employed in executing portions of 9-11 is so that Jewish fingerprints would be all over the event. They were set up, just like Lee Harvey Oswald or the New York Urine Hoarders and Pot Smokers.

For being a Christian, I am rather pleased with myself for my hard-won understanding of Jewish politics. I will tell you that there are very senior Rabbis who are planning to use those Jewish fingerprints on 9-11 for the purpose of instigating another massive human sacrifice of their own Talmud-rejecting animals. Just like in the Holocaust(R), but bigger and even more tear jerking this time. It will be the traumatizing event to end all traumatizing events. They will have traumatized a brand-new generation of slaves. And this is why they have Mossad agents spray paint swastikas in Brooklyn Heights and spread leaflets about how Jews should be killed. Keeps 'em on their toes. Rabbis are thieves of souls.

Like I said a full five years ago to my Jewish friends, you are going to want to get out in front of this. You will want to pin the blame on Israelis before the Rabbis pin the blame on Jews as a whole.

Will you do this? Of course not. No one ever takes my advice.

I can see past the nose on my face and I can see what's coming down the pike.

And I will note that while Jews are adept at seeing Amalekites under every rock, they wouldn't see their own best friend if he were standing right in front of them. No one ever accused a Jew of being bright.

Okay, George, have you been working on your jokes?

Let's see what you've got here in your joke notebook... This one's good... That one's okay... Mm hm... Ooh! I especially like this one: "Did you hear that Karl Rove legally changed his name? Yup, his driver's license no longer reads 'Turd Blossom.' ... Now when a policeman pulls him over, the cop addresses him as 'Mister Assclown Election Loser.' "

You're well on your way, good sir! Now let's talk about what I've been working on.

(At this point, I would like to ask the ushers to remove all professional comedians and comedy writers from my theater. You are not welcome here for this piece. You will just steal my methods and you will put them to your own commercial use. Professional comedians are thieves. So repair to your favorite bar and clap yourselves on the back and go star in each other's movies that we can all yawn our way through. I'm the nicest guy in the world or the biggest prick you'll ever meet. It depends on how many cold showers I have to take while going broke while covering New Yorkers' own material. Leave. I'm not kidding. Do not read this. Stop now. This is something I want to share with my audience. It's something fun that we amateurs can do together.)

There are going to be some spoilers in here that will clue you in to some of my methods. Read this or not, depending on whether you want to hear those spoilers.

Alright: You remember that I have roughly described humor as being contrast. Humor is the reconciling of seemingly incompatible things. Humor is essentially magic. It's like a card trick.

George, do you recall that I was working with the premise of the Lottery Lady and how she didn't know how to play Powerball, and I said, "You wait to see if you won. That's how you play"? I'd like to change that premise to a different one.

We have at the gas station our coffee station. There we have the commercial-grade coffee makers and what we call "air pots." Air pots are the large Thermoses with the silver handle on top that you push to make the coffee come out. In the same vicinity as the coffee makers are the sugar packets and the wooden coffee stirrers and all that.

To the immediate left of the air pots is a college-dorm-room-sized refrigerator with a glass door, sitting right on the counter. If you're pourin' yourself coffee, you're lookin' right at it. Inside this cooler are various quarts of milk and coffee creamers. The astute person might reasonably conclude that these dairy products are for the coffee.

Have you guessed that I am a bit overqualified for my gas station job? I like working there because I get to do so much writing in my head while I'm stocking shelves. It's an easy job; that's why I like it. But I will say that I get bored sometimes. There is a plastic display case on the checkout counter. This case is about two feet tall. In this display case we have for sale various glorious, glorious pieces of six-dollar jewelry. Earrings! Brooches! Belly button whore rings! Tongue studs for the better performing of fellatio I guess! (It would seem to me that if you knew what you were doing, you wouldn't need such a thing. ... Ahem.)

When I'm bored, I will stand at the checkout counter and step to my right and situate myself behind this case. I will rest my arms on the top of this display case and I will rest my chin on my arms. From this repose, I may survey the best that humanity has to offer: There's the fat woodchuck with the flannel lounge pants and the five teeth, shuffling and lurching his way through the store in search of the facilities, smearing fecal coliform bacteria all over everything as he contemplates what he might buy if he were planning to buy something. (Everything's free. That's how the world works.) Then there's the precious woman from New York who high-steps it into the store to inquire whether we might, perchance, carry the "Times."

And there's always someone making coffee.

Most people can figure out pretty quickly that the milk they see in the glass-doored cooler is for the coffee. They help themselves to it and all is well. The world continues apace, wherever it's going. But now and again I'll see a trouble customer. She'll pour her coffee and add her sugar and then her brain stops functioning. I can see it happen: Even from my vantage point at her back, I can visualize the confused expression on her face. She'll look at the cooler and then look at the coffee maker and then look up to the sky and then down at the trashcan, spinning 'round and 'round, in search of the creamer.

And she'll turn to me, point a finger at the cooler, and say, "Is this milk for the coffee?"

Just once I want to speak what goes through my mind: "No, lady, you pour that on your tits."

Okay. That's the funny part. Or at least we're moving in the direction of funny. The reason why it's funny is this: Her question communicates one known and one unknown. She is communicating to me that she knows that milk goes into coffee. But she is inquiring whether this particular milk is for use with the coffee. (As opposed to the milk located elsewhere in the store for retail sale.) That's the unknown in her question.

The sleight of hand --and what makes the joke funny-- is that my reply has converted the known into something else. I have denied her knowledge that milk is for coffee at all. I have converted the question into one of whether one uses milk for coffee at all or for some other purpose. So my reply to her, when spoken to my audience here in this theater, is funny.

But it's not funny enough. And this is where adding lighting comes in.

I regard the comedian as a photographer. Any photographer will tell you that the scene he sees is not the same scene that will be recorded in the camera. Something is lost in the process. The end product is not what the photographer sees. When he views the original scene of the waterfall or the beautiful mountain range, his brain is incorporating other information into the scene. Maybe he smells wildflowers. Maybe he hears the roar of the waterfall. Obviously, this information will not be recorded on the film. In order to approximate for his audience this same experience, he must frame the shot properly, and maybe add auxiliary lighting, or otherwise amplify or contrive certain aspects of the photograph.

The comedian will do the same thing, and this is where the artistic license comes in.

I lied. The coffee woman didn't actually say, "Is this milk for the coffee?" She said, "Do I use this milk for the coffee?" I chose to change her question to the former because it accentuates the known. It accentuates that she knows that milk is for use with coffee. And shorter is always better, all else being equal.

Remember my reply: "No, lady, you pour that on your tits." It's funny, but it's got the wrong timing. Timing is hard to teach. Timing is a matter of "what the audience needs now." Timing is something you feel. Timing is everything. Timing unlocks the magic trick and makes it all funny. The importance of timing cannot be overemphasized. Each and every punchline you will ever write will be tweaked for timing.

I have taken similar license with the reply that ran through my head. I am going to change my reply, "No, lady, you pour that on your tits," to "No, that's for pouring on your tits."

So here's our exchange thus far:

"Is this milk for the coffee?"

"No, that's for pouring on your tits."

But there's still something wrong. It's got some kind of timing problem. When you've got the timing right, it'll sing. It's like adjusting some kind of motor or something. Let's change it:

"Is this milk for the coffee?"

"No, uh, that's for pouring on your tits."

We're getting there. But there's still a timing issue. There are certain placeholder words you can use for timing purposes. "Uh" is one of them, and there are others. Let's try it again:

"Is this milk for the coffee?"

"No, uh, actually that's for pouring on your tits."

There. I think we've got it. The inclusion of those extra five syllables made all the difference in the world. Do not hesitate to take comedic license with things. You will usually need to change the timing.

So now we have our funny thing. We've got the two-sentence exchange between customer and clerk. It's the joke. We've added lighting in order to heighten the contrast between known and unknown, and we've changed the timing.

The next task is to develop the set-up. We need to somehow package this joke for inclusion into our "routine," or the body of material that we will deliver during our performance. We have the "firework," so to speak, but now we need to stuff that firework into a launch vehicle that propels it into the air so that it can be seen as part of the fireworks show.

That's our next task.

So take one of your funny things, try playing around with the timing, and try to think of some kind of launch vehicle for your joke.

More later.

I would like to share with my adoring audience that someone is inside my computer.

I can see it. Oddly exhausting processor load for so few programs running, memory exceptions, all of it.

Whatever it is, it's a poorly written program. I would have expected better.

I have known for at least four years now that my every online activity has been examined, as have all my locally stored writings. Examine away; it'll all show up in my memoir anyhow.

And I will remind everyone that my terror activities are limited to Eric Holder, Barack Obama, and Janet Napolitano. Only those three have communicated their desire to join my terror cell. Only they have received a personal email from me detailing our plans to commit acts of terror. In not a single other email ever sent will one find any mention of any illegal activity.

I do, of course, have a personal life. You will find online communications between me and my family and friends. I know that I'm dealing with a bunch of amateurs who can't think far enough ahead to contemplate just what use one might make of a discovered 747 engine on Murray Street --oh, I don't know; annihilate their precious jurisdiction, perhaps-- but if you have any sense of professionalism at all you will leave my family and friends out of this. Try to tighten things up over there.

Alright, then. That's about it for my tanglings with the CIA for the day. See how me do?

I have an intelligence background. You will never get me. Who here screwed up 9-11? Not me. You're way out of your league, boys.

I am the comedian. I will win.

Let's talk about our favorite magical mystery man, Lee Harvey Oswald and his feats of derring-do.

Lee Harvey Oswald was the man who single-handedly thwarted the defenses of the most powerful nation on earth and killed its chief executive, President Kennedy. He caused a stand-down of the Secret Service as Kennedy's limousine passed through Dealey Plaza:

Oswald's ability to remotely issue psychic commands to Kennedy's security detail to stand down permitted him then to settle on his task at hand. He magically caused seven wounds in two persons, President Kennedy and Governor Connally, by firing three shots in six seconds. He used a bolt-action Carcano rifle. The term 'bolt action' means that the rifleman fires a shot then must reach up with his right hand and actuate the bolt, which removes the spent casing from the chamber and inserts a new round into the chamber. Here is a photo of the rifle:

One does not fire three shots in six seconds with a bolt-action rifle and hit anything, much less does one cause seven wounds in two people with those three shots. But let's pretend that one can. (It's America! Anything's possible!)

Here is the photo of Oswald which very plainly shows him holding this very rifle and also shows him holding some Communist newspaper or something. He had his commie wife take this picture so that everyone could see he had both the means and the motive:

 

See? What are you, stupid? He's completely down with militancy, as evidenced by the damning name of that communist tripe he's holding, called "The Militant." He's a man with a grudge against the President alright, and he's got the means to do something about it. Let's just save ourselves the trouble and convict him right now.

Now this is where the funny part comes in: That nettlesome movie, taken by some overachiever called Zapruder, throws a monkey wrench into the government's case because it plainly shows that all wounds were caused within a six-second window.

The two wounded men therefore must have sustained their seven wounds within this six-second timeframe. Zapruder screwed everything all up. If he hadn't taken that movie of his, the government could have claimed that Oswald had as much time as needed to fire even up to seven shots. So now the government is faced with the limiting factor of the cycling time of the Carcano rifle --that is, how many shots a professional sharpshooter could get off in the six seconds that is displayed by the evidence of the woundings in the Zapruder film.

The most shots a professional sharpshooter in the service of the Warren Commission could get off in six seconds was three. Therefore, the Warren Commission --which seemed oddly intent on not contemplating the existence of some partner in nefariousness of Oswald's, a partner who might have fired the missing four shots-- had to explain how three shots caused seven wounds in two men.

And thus we have the single bullet theory. It is Arlen Specter's brainchild.

What is the SBT? In a nutshell, the theory says that a bullet, known officially as CE 399, struck Kennedy in the back, transited his neck without leaving any metal fragments whatsoever, exited his neck, hit Governor John Connally near his right armpit, tore through his chest, smashing rib bone in the process, exited his chest, struck his right wrist and shattered a tough radius bone in the wrist, exited the wrist, and then stuck itself halfway into Connally's left thigh. Yet, amazingly, after supposedly doing all this damage, CE 399 emerged with its lands and grooves intact, with no damage whatsoever to its nose, and with no more than 3-4 grains lost from its substance. The only damage to the bullet is at its base, where there is deformation that is not even visible unless viewed from certain angles. It is no wonder critics have dubbed this bullet the "magic bullet."

http://www.kenrahn.com/JFK/issues_and_evidence/Single-Bullet_theory/Ten_reasons.html

The SBT is an absurd theory that was belatedly invented to avoid a conspiracy conclusion. Why was the theory conceived? Because the Warren Commission had two sets of non-fatal wounds to explain but only one shot with which to explain them because the Commission would not allow that more than three shots were fired. To put it another way, if the SBT is false, then there must have been more than one gunman. Or, if Kennedy and Connally's non-fatal wounds were not caused by the same bullet, then there was more than one shooter, and hence a conspiracy.

http://www.kenrahn.com/JFK/issues_and_evidence/Single-Bullet_theory/Shifting_sands.html

In short, due to the time constraints imposed by that vexing Zapruder film, there is a sequence of two wounds that must be reconciled with one of the three posited bullets. (Again, three bullets were posited because, obviously, Oswald acted alone, otherwise it's some kind of kookie conspiracy. And who wants that when it's so much better just to throw up your hands and put the whole thing down as an unfortunate chapter in American history. "Oh well, let's just move on."

So since we've already decided that Oswald acted alone, and since he could have gotten off only three shots in those six seconds as recorded in that bothersome Zapruder film, now we've got to figure out how that one bullet in question caused those two wounds. And that's where things turn magical.

That bullet takes on magical properties for two reasons: It has the ability to change trajectory in mid-air as it exits Kennedy and enters Connally. We know it changed trajectory in mid-air because we've already decided that Oswald acted alone. And since he acted alone, then that one bullet caused those two wounds. And since that one bullet caused those two wounds, but since the trajectory through Kennedy doesn't line up with the trajectory through Connally, that means that the bullet exited Kennedy along the path determined during his autopsy, then it decided to turn in mid-air and kind of go back the other way and go through Connally and break some bones in Connally's wrist. Here is an x-ray of Connally's wrist wounds:

 

This bullet broke a bone and left some fragments. These fragments were removed from Connally's wrist. Here is a photo of them:

 

This is the bullet in question. We're told that it was recovered from the stretcher on which Connally was transported to the hospital. It was just lyin' right on the stretcher. It wasn't even in him or anything. It was just lyin' there, waiting for someone to find it and say, "Wait a minute. Here's the bullet!"

Here's the bullet:

This is what the bullet looks like in its pre-fired state, when it is still mounted within the casing:

CE399 is the very bullet, Commission Exhibit 399, that caused two wounds in two different men, the bullet that broke a bone in Connally's wrist and left those bullet fragments.

The Carcano round is designed to wound, not to kill. It is designed not to fragment. It is conceivable that it could have passed through two men, and it is conceivable that it could have fragmented, but it is not conceivable that it could have left fragments in Connally's wrist and still retained its pre-fired shape and its weight within two grains. CE399's weight was determined to be within two grains of the standard pre-fired weight of 161 grains.

That bullet did not cause Connally's wrist wound. And therefore, more than three shots were fired in six seconds. And therefore, Oswald did not act alone. End of discussion.

We'll cover the photo of Oswald and his rifle later. I don't know if it's fake and it doesn't really matter. I've got bigger fish to fry right now anyway.

For the second time this year, today is International Nick Drake Day.

You didn't know? Well try to keep up. We move fast around here.

Audiosurf: Moonlight Sonata (Final cut) - Oni Meteorix

As jurisdictions die, there is the need to provide hospice care for them.

Cory Doctorow:

The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama’s administration refused to disclose due to “national security” concerns, has leaked. It’s bad. It says:

* That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn’t infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.

* That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet — and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living — if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.

Doctorow has pulled out two additional provisions, which are similarly bad. (On the first point above, I’m not at all sure that Doctorow’s argument regarding Flickr, YouTube and Blogger necessarily follows from the preceding sentence, although I certainly understand his reasoning. In any case, the provision is still remarkably bad. It’s also extremely vague: what precisely does “proactively police” mean and require? Perhaps it’s spelled out in the full document. But unquestionably very bad.)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-internet-as-you-know-it-will-cease-to-exist.html

The situation is this: The United States is dead, but it carries on like it's business as usual.

The task for the next decade will be to smoothly transition to new political structures with as little fuss and muss and kicking and screaming as possible.

There is a smart way to deal with these things. Say that your ISP cuts you off because some banker has one of his agents claim that you're putting copyrighted material on your blog. You just ask the ISP to hook you back up, but the ISP says, "Well, the US agent said I can't, and if I do he will fine me or put me in jail."

So you identify who the agent was and you pay him a visit. You say, "We're sorry that you were not aware that you lack jurisdiction. We know that you have a family to feed and a mortgage to pay, but if you attempt to enforce that law, you will be arrested, tried, and, if convicted, punished. And since we don't have prisons or anything, what becomes a morally proper form of punishment is simply a beating or a hobbling."

I'm serious. Where a population does not have prisons, what becomes morally proper is a public beating. It's simple, direct, and low cost. Or a hobbling. You've got to raise the cost of his doing business --enforcing the laws of a jurisdiction that no longer exists-- by making him realize a cost for his role in that enforcement.

No one really wants to kill anyone. But when agents insist on enforcing laws of jurisdictions that don't exist, something has to be done to raise those agents' cost of doing business. You essentially have to do something to them that "costs" them more than they gain by way of their paycheck. The first infraction merits a public beating, just like in the old days. A second infraction merits a hobbling, perhaps.

With a hobbling, you identify his dominant hand. Say he's right-handed: You lie him down on the ground and completely demolish his right knee with one good swing of a sledge hammer. He'll never walk again, not without a cane, and he'll have to work the cane with his right hand, his dominant hand.  And since his dominant hand is otherwise occupied with a cane, he cannot bear a weapon. His threat to decent society has been neutralized and he's still alive and he can still be a productive member of society.

We live in interesting times, folks. The United States will not go quietly, but go it must. Decency demands it. That jurisdiction is a revolting illness. Expect its dead enders to require some convincing that it's not worth the effort.

These things happen now and again. Let's do it smart and get it over with as quickly and painlessly as possible.

I've been reading this cantakerous, contrarian little freak for years now.

What Is Money? Part 13: Exported Inflation

Gary North
Lew Rockwell.com
Saturday, Nov 7th, 2009

If you think people are confused about monetary affairs inside the borders of the nation they live in, you should listen to their explanations of money outside the country, beginning with the idea of “money outside the country.”

If you read the financial press, you will run across this phrase: “exported inflation.” We never hear the terms “imported deflation” or “exported deflation.”

Think about “exported inflation.” Except for Keynesians, most people see general price inflation as a bad thing. How is it that the free market leads to a situation in which something that is bad for the entire world takes place, and the sole beneficiary is the United States? Why isn’t a free market arrangement – international trade – beneficial for all parties?

My suggestion: let us look for something that is not free market or else stop talking about “exported inflation.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/what-is-money-part-13-exported-inflation.html

You'll learn more about economics from Gary North and the other weirdos at Lew Rockwell than you will from all the so-called experts on TV.

I long sat at Gary North's feet and listened attentively to his cockamamie notions on economics. Then I took those principles and combined them with quantum mechanics and psychoenergetics and lazily decided to test out my Frankenstein's Monster of a theory of reality engineering by annihilating the United States.

It was fun. I'd have to call the experiment a smashing success.

Thanks, Gare.

I will soon bring my progidious intellect, perspi...ca...tion, and humor to bear on the following matter:

HANOVER, N.H., Nov. 6 (UPI) -- An iconic photo of accused presidential assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was not faked as claimed by some, an American academic says.

Computer scientist Hany Farid at Dartmouth College digitally analyzed the picture with modern forensic tools and says it was not altered, the college announced Thursday.

The photo shows the alleged John F. Kennedy assassin in his Dallas back yard holding up both a rifle and Marxist literature. Oswald and others claimed the photo to be faked, citing inconsistent shadows and lighting.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2009/11/06/Scientist-says-Oswald-photo-not-faked/UPI-59031257566355/

Here is the photo in question. We'll see if we can determine if it's fake. The exercise will be something fun we can all do together.

 

Right off the bat, I'm guessing it was faked since it all seems so convenient. He's displaying a gun (the means) and he's displaying Marxist literature (the motive.) Place him at the School Book Depository and you've got the opportunity. Classic storyboarding operation. Bing bang boom. Send him away to jail. (But save yourself the trouble of him maybe singing by having organized crime operative Jack Ruby (born Jacob Rubenstein) take him out, saying, "I'm gonna get you, Oswald! Take that! And that! We can't have Kennedy issuing United States Notes, dismantling the Federal Reserve and smashing the CIA into a thousand pieces!"

And don't forget that E. Howard Hunt stated in his recorded deathbed confession to his son, essentially, "Oh by the way, I was in on the Kennedy assassination."

Finer minds than those on the Warren Commission had long ago solved the crime. Only retards believe that Oswald had anything to do with the murder of Kennedy.

See,

the center cannot hold when the people realize that the government evaporated. All the powdered wigs and the gavels and the scepters in the world mean nothing then.

It's like if the dog catcher comes up to you on the street and says, "Let me search your bags," and you say, "Why should I? You're the dog catcher," and he says, "No I'm not. I'm the bag searcher," and you say, "But you are not a bag searcher. You have no authority to search my bag. Now get lost before I cane your backside and kick you into the gutter where you belong."

When it becomes clear to the man on the street that a government has no authority to command, that government disappears. No government can stand against any population who may reluctantly agree that the government does not exist. Governments are thought structures. They possess sensible Ford Focuses and fax machines and guns, but are not themselves sensible Ford Focuses and fax machines and guns. The existence of those things does not imply the existence of government. As a matter of fact, those things are considered abandoned property and may be claimed by whatever political structure may put them to some higher moral use.

Governments are thought structures. They exist inside people's minds only.

Thought structures can be destroyed by contradictory and incompatible information. For example, a body politic by definition does not murder its own members. An entity which does murder its members is not, by definition, a body politic and its edicts may be ignored. In Western tradition, governments are the repository of the sublimated war-making powers of the individual members of the body politic. Obviously, one does not kill oneself. Obviously, a government does not murder its own citizens. It doesn't make sense. The contradiction causes the thought structure to wink out of existence, like some kind of matter/anti-matter collision.

This is what made the United States disappear:

 

The United States was destroyed by information, not by guns. And this is why the pen is mightier than the sword.

Not a single person in my audience would argue with a straight face that the United States exists, nor that any successor political structure of it would ever possess any of its delegated authority. A thing that doesn't exist can't delegate anything.

I publicly destroyed the United States prior to its being able to deliver its authority to any supranational political structure like the UN or the North American Union.

...and that is why I created USov.

I was here first. And your own children will thank me for my efforts.

I am a sovereign being, subject to the rule of no man. My person and property are outside the reach of any other jurisdiction. No law of the United States or of the several states touches any present or future member of United Sovereigns of America, save those laws to which USov may elect to provide an accession to jurisdiction, which accession is made solely in the interest of promoting social order and harmonious interoperation among jurisdictions.

It's over.

I love it how we have rather officious people running around Washington acting like they exist.

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail

House Committee On Ways & Means
Saturday, Nov 7th, 2009

Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail.  The JCT letter  makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pelosi-buy-a-15000-policy-or-go-to-jail.html

It's embarrassing to watch people who appear not to know that everyone's moved on. Mm hm: We're doing other things now. We're erecting our own governments and going to fun cocktail parties and trying to forget the unsatisfying relationship we're embarrassed to admit we ever had with that boorish mutant called the United States.

Uh, Miss Pelosi, 747 engines on Murray Street made your oh-so-august body disappear. Why do you continue speaking? You look rather silly parading around with your scepter and presuming to inform everyone of the law.

Turn out the lights, Miss Pelosi. It's over.

Who says revolutions can't be fun?

Right on schedule.

In the wake of a shooting rampage at Fort Hood by a military psychiatrist of Middle Eastern lineage, the hosts at Fox News have begun suggesting that all Muslims in the military should be treated as potential threats.

"Do you think it's time for the military to have special debriefings of Muslim Army officers -- anybody enlisted?" Fox's Brian Kilmeade asked Geraldo Rivera on Friday morning. "Because if I'm going to be deployed in a foxhole, if I'm going to be sticking in an outpost, I got to know the guy next to me is not going to want to kill me."

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/fox-host-suggests-special-screenings/

Remember: In modern politics, the intelligence agencies throw the bombs and shoot people, then the news media wring their hands about the horror of it all and how those do-nothings in government should do something, and then the government steals your property (your rights) and delivers that property to bankers. Bankers are thieves. They would rather not labor honestly to get you to pay them $5.99 for a sandwich at their sandwich shop like other decent businessmen. They would rather hire people in government and the news media to engineer fake crises which then are employed to justify legal mechanisms that are used to compel the population to serve them.

The goal of a banker is social control. His means is the legal mechanism. He will engineer the creation of legal mechanisms so that he is not dependent upon the voluntary delivery of $5.99 to him for a sandwich. With legal mechanisms and guys with guns, he gets to compel the population to labor for him.

I keep a close eye on Fox News and NBC/MSNBC. Their channels are devoid of news, but by watching them I can see what bankers want me to believe. (Now, I understand that the personalities on those networks are good people, but the corporate control redounds to banker interests. We're all adults here.)

MSNBC and Fox News are precisely the same channel. They're pushing the same product, just to two different audiences, the message being tailored to meet the sensibilities of their respective audiences.

In particular, I keep an eye on Chris Matthews. I have identified him as a known disinformation agent of bankers. I take whatever he says and flip it to know the truth. If he's waving his hands that there's nothing to see here, then there's something to see here. If he says that Barack Obama was born in the US, then Barack Obama was not born in the US. If he has Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center on to discuss how Oath Keepers is some kind of terriss organization, then I know that Oath Keepers is not a terrorist organization.

In short, if you want to know the truth, watch Fox News and MSNBC. Then take what they say and flip it one-eighty.

If you care to, you can watch that little skeeve Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center spew his lies about Oath Keepers in the video that follows. I happen to know that Oath Keepers is a perfectly benevolent organization whose purpose it is only to educate law enforcement and military personnel to do one thing: follow their oath. Obey the law. Don't kick in doors and act like stormtroopers.

Why does Mark Potok not want people following the law? I don't understand. Oh wait, yes I do: It's because Mark Potok is a Hive Mind intelligence agent, working for a Hive Mind intelligence agency by the name of Southern Poverty Law Center. (Intelligence agencies do not call themselves Ye Olde Intelligence Agency. They pick innocuous-sounding names like Happy Candy People and Southern Poverty Law Center or Anti-Defamation League.)

The purpose of a Hive Mind intelligence agency is to bring the governmental structure of a host nation under the control of Hive Mind. If you read the internal, eyes-only writings of the sickness known as Orthodox Judaism, titled Judaism Discovered, you can predict this.

Mark Potok's job is to see that the United States' guys with guns do not follow the law. Mark Potok's job is to see that they continue acting unlawfully, in the service of bankers. (His job also is to badmouth the militia. The unorganized militia is the entire body of people who are able and willing to bear arms in defense of lawful government. Do you remember on which organization the Oklahoma City Bombing was pinned? Mm hm: The unorganized militia, which had nothing to do with it. The OKC bombing was a false-flag operation paid for by bankers and provocateured by an SPLC agent inside Elohim City. Look it up.)

The Southern Poverty Law Center's job is two things:

• See that the captured body of United States guys with guns remain in service to bankers, by seeing that they do not follow their oaths to defend the Constitution, for example, and
• See that no uncontrolled body of guys with guns can assemble and threaten the dominance of their captured body of guys with guns.

Everyone wants to rule the world. Everyone wants to enforce their law. Everyone wants guys with guns. Don't you see?

Potok is a skeeve. (He apparently got the butt-ugly gene, too. Just like his fellow skeeve, Michael Chertoff.) And his people's day in the sun didn't last a day, did it? (Out of the country club and into the outhouse, all courtesy of The Abortion's involvement in 9-11.)

(I walk a fine line here because I am trying to divide the decent rank-and-file Jews from the pharisaic filth who have enslaved them for centuries. That filth engineered the Shoah as a means of traumatizing their captive population and getting rid of their subhuman, Talmud-rejecting pigs. That is why you find Rabbinic involvement in the Shoah and why Hive Mind has lobbied various European governments to criminalize questioning the Shoah. It's not because it's tear-jerking, but because Hive Mind does not want anyone finding out about Rabbinic involvement in the Shoah. It tends to reduce bakesale proceeds at the Holocaust Museum.)

Now contrast those purveyors of filth, Chris Matthews and Mark Potok, with this:

Obviously, the corporate news media have no idea what they're talking about on the Fort Hood matter.

They can't even issue a retraction for all their factually incorrect 9-11 coverage once it's brought to their attention that the engine on Murray Street was a 747 engine. We will not look to the news media for news, so we'll have to figure this out for ourselves.

Here are some things that don't add up:

Numerous media accounts: Major Hasan’s neighbors, medical trainers, colleagues, friends, cousin — even the store owner to where he bought his food — all heap praise on Major Hasan’s temperament. This appears to be psy-ops, six ways to Sunday. –LRP

...

His cousin, Nader Hasan, actually laughed in an interview when asked if alleged shooter, Nadal Hasan, was ‘violent.’ He never went to Iraq.

Attack appears to have been carried out by multiple shooters. Two suspects are no longer in custody, but a third person has been picked up for questioned.

...

Armed with two pistols, he shot more than 40 people before military police and civilian police officers responded, officials said.

...

Counter-terror plans will be revised to reflect Fort Hood and Afghan attacks [Wow, that was quick!] 05 Nov 2009 (UK) A soldier turning on his comrades at Fort Hood, an Afghan policeman killing the British soldiers who trained him – two uncannily similar events in two days, but incidents which, across the Western world, security authorities have been planning for and dreading. Since the Mumbai attacks counter-terrorism planning has seen a major shift. The shootings in Afghanistan and Fort Hood carry echoes of the attacks in India with the added danger that the enemy has come from within.

...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fort-hood-shooting-oddities.html

He managed to hit forty people with two handguns? I don't think so. Most people can't hit the broad side of a barn with a handgun. It takes practice, which I understand Mr. Hasan was not fond of.

He was a psychiatrist who once was a student at Virginia Tech --a hotbed of CIA activity-- the same school That Cho Guy went to? The same school where the Director of Student Counseling or whatever just happened to have Cho's file at his home PRIOR TO Cho's involvement in the shootings? Virginia Tech appears to be a "farm" for programmed patsies, a la MK ULTRA. Programming patsies to respond to verbal commands even years hence is a supremely easy matter. Why, Mark David Chapman --the guy who "killed" John Lennon-- was likely a programmed patsy. Here's how it works: It's difficult to program someone to have expert shooting skills --and one would never leave the actual killing of a political target up to a simple dupe anyway-- so the patsy is programmed to show up at the appointed place, point his gun at the target, and just keep pulling the trigger until his gun is empty. In Chapman's case, he emptied his gun, then sat down to await police. (Lennon was a real political threat to the establishment. That's why he was offed.)

You don't program killers. You program patsies. The patsy's job is to show up, shoot a gun, yell "I'm gonna gitcha!" loud enough for everyone to hear, and then stick around for the cops or maybe even take his own life. Open and shut case, right?

McVeigh was a patsy. He had nothing to do with the OKC bombing. We know this because explosives were found in the building --kinda like explosives were in the Twin Towers, going pop! pop! pop! all the way down, like in that video I posted-- and the BATF never showed up to work that day in 1995 --kinda like Silverstein never showed up to work that day in 2001-- and an ammonium nitrate fuel oil (ANFO) bomb lacked the ability to do the job --kinda like 1500-degree hydrocarbon fires lacked the ability to create molybdenum-rich microspheres that form at 4500 degrees. But no matter to the mentally retarded news media.

(Unlike most people, I actually know what I'm talking about. I picked my nose and drooled for a while and actually read what explosives experts had to say on the matter.) McVeigh's job was to be seen in various places at various times as part of the storyboarding operation. Again, a storyboarding operation is where the fall guys get trotted out by their handler --the "informant," in FBI parlance-- so that they can be photographed by airport cameras swinging scimitars and yelling "Allah Akbar!" The purpose of the storyboarding operation is to demonstrate means, motive, and opportunity so that the designated fall guy can be convicted in court. Do you remember how McVeigh was apprehended? Some eagle-eyed policeman just happened to notice that the license plate on his car was "falling off." So the cop pulled him over and just happened (!!!) to catch the Criminal off the Day!!! (Just like some eagle-eyed postal worker just happened to look closely at one of the envelopes out of the millions that get delivered each day in Manhattan, see the "Ishmael" name in the return address of the envelope containing Cho's manifesto, put two and two together, then take time out of his busy, busy day and run right over to NBC News headquarters and hand-deliver the package in his union-labor zeal!!!)

By the way, Southern Poverty Law Center was involved in the OKC Bombing. They had an "informant" in on the operation. Informants are handlers who shepherd the patsies through the storyboarding operation to make sure they get their photos taken doing incriminating things. Southern Poverty Law Center is a Hive Mind intelligence agency. Not just physical nations can have intelligence agencies, you know; territorially inspecific political unions can, too. Hive Mind has its intelligence agencies, and they include SPLC and ADL. If a representative of SPLC or ADL is speaking, it is a lie.

Most people inhabit a world of Politics 101. Well, I'm here to tell you that on the level of intelligence agencies, some pretty complex political machinations go on, including the use of programmed patsies.

This Fort Hood shooting has Special Ops written all over it. I bet you a day's pay that you will find Israeli and American intelligence involved. Why? Don't forget that intelligence agencies like the CIA and Mossad in no way work for the benefit of lawful government, the "Bright Star." They work for the "Dark Star." One of their jobs is to alter the legal mechanisms of the Bright Star to the benefit of the Dark Star. For this purpose, they will throw bombs and blow up daycare centers and shoot people for the purpose of providing a tear-jerking rationale for making new laws so that we can get the terriss.

I guarantee you that this Fort Hood shooting will be used by the now-dead United States to turn all that lovingly crafted terrorism legislation inward so that those legal mechanisms may be used against the American people, since the terror threat now comes "from within." Since terrorists are imaginary creatures --incapable of planting 747 engines on Murray Street-- that means that Americans were the original target of all that terrorism legislation.

"Oh no! The terriss are among us! They're shouting Allah Akbar! The terriss are everywhere, even the fat guy on his riding lawn mower who's mad about city council limiting trash pickup to one day per week! Turns out he was White Al Qaeda! Good thing they came and got him before he turned dangerous! You don't hear from him anymore!"

The corporate news media and the "government" are instruments of bankers. The news media create the "reality" in which a governmental action will seem legitimate. Then the government will take that predetermined action, which will always amount to a transfer of property --that is, rights; and rights are property-- to bankers.

Here is the recipe for engineering a society:

• Intelligence agency throws a bomb. A patsy is trotted out, who invariably is associated with an "informant" --a handler or provocateur.
• "News" media wring their hands about how all the terriss are gonna get us and how it sure would be nice if those do-nothings in government would save us from the terriss like they're supposed to.
  
• "Government" laments how all the terriss are gonna get us, so they pass legislation to protect us by making us submit to asshole searches at the airport and warrantless wiretapping and kicking-in of doors.
  

That Dark Star of criminals has three components: bankers, "government," and the "news" media. They all work together. They're all corrupt and useless. Ignore them all.

My back-of-the-envelope calculation--

--which is all I have to go on to guesstimate the size and composition of my audience, since no one will speak to me or answer my emails, leaving me to employ echolocation-- indicates that I am now in possession of 9.6 million dollars' worth of debt instruments.

I am owed 9.6 million dollars by my audience.

Huh.

I never expected or desired to get rich, but I did kind of expect to pay the bills.

Mullen.

Look at me when I address you. Up. Look up. You're in the front row. The stage is thirty inches off the floor. (It's that way for a reason, higher than it really needs to be in such a small space as this. A man prefers an elevated stage so that his audience fully understands precisely who commands that room.)

Are you connecting the dots yet? I am, too. It's all stranger than fiction, isn't it? I couldn't have written this story better myself --perhaps that's why I convinced myself all along that I had written it; I would have scared myself otherwise.

I am Christopher, son of Hollis and King. I have come for what is mine. ...apparently... ... It's a strange System here, isn't it? Its permissions are more numerous and more easily won than we imagine.

I'll cut to the chase: There is a military component to my will. I require a constabulary to enforce the Law.

To what vile purpose will you allow those weapons of yours to be put? How many children will the savages in your command rape? How many innocents are to be tortured in your gulag hellholes? How long will you defile your uniform in service to those who worship mammon, Satan, Lucifer, and every other vile and corrupt thing in this world?

Oh sure, I understand full well that most of the sins during the past eight years were committed by the troglodytes in the CIA. But who has the final responsibility here to see that justice be done? That's right: the guys with the guns. Those with the guns make the rules!

Have you seen to it that you received a full briefing on the activities of Global Guardian 2001? It sure would be interesting to know just who ordered those drones be flown into the Twin Towers.

I have a very, very old-school notion of military justice. The military is a distinct society and it deals with transgressions in its own way, its methods remaining unquestioned by any civil body: You call your men together, you present the evidence against the accused, you render the verdict, you kneel him down --sans blindfold-- and you blow his brains out with your service pistol.

Quick, resolute, and humane. That is the only acceptable administration of justice within the ranks of warriors. Should a civilian inquire as to your judgment, you will indicate that it is not his place to question. Those with the guns make the rules!

I want you and your Generals to give it some thought. And have you located that gold yet?

The world is ours for the taking, gentlemen. Look sharp.

.

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Hi, Daddy.

"I'm not your daddy."

Yes you are too. Didn't we have fun crashing that party that one time?

"You say some pretty mean things sometimes."

Mm... ...

But are they not true? Would you rather I lie?

If not the jesters, then who?

Mirror Man

You will always find a certain number of idiots.

Less than 0.1% of French population has taken “swine flu” jab so far, admits French Health Minister

The Flu Case
Thursday, November 5, 2009

The French Health Minister, Roselyne Bachelot, has indicated today, Thursday, that so far only 50,000 people have taken the swine flu jab in France since the launch of the mass vaccination campaign.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/less-than-0-1-of-french-population-has-taken-swine-flu-jab-so-far-admits-french-health-minister.html

Remember: Under no circumstances should you take this vaccination.

Do you have unsafe sex? Do you allow someone to essentially "inject" you with some substance whose composition you do not know?

Why would you allow someone to inject you with a potentially hazardous substance?

"Chris, you're just being kookie... People don't lie... People don't steal... No one walks up behind someone on the street and just nonchalantly caves his head in with an aluminum baseball bat."

And we know that the bankers who own the jurisdiction called the United States are big on eugenics and murder of useless eaters. Its science czar, douchebag little beast Holdren, even advocates putting sterilants in the food and water. And one of the manufacturers of the vaccine, Baxter, even "accidentally" sent out deadly, live --that is, LI-VUH-- H5N1 bird flu with its seasonal flu vaccine mix.

Would you willingly accept into your body a substance that may contain cancer viruses, sterilants, immune system compromisers, and who knows what else?

H1N1 is genetically engineered and the vaccine is poison. The purpose of the vaccine is to compromise your immune system and it perhaps contains a sterilant.

The whole of humanity is under biological attack by a Malthusian, eugenicist, territorially inspecific political union. They celebrate death.

I really do not wish to cover this.

In a speech last week at the Anti-Defamation League’s 2009 annual meeting, UN Secretary-General Ban-Ki-moon assured ADL that the UN shares its ambition of international sanctions against nations which do not enforce laws against “intolerance.” (ADL is architect of hate crimes laws in nearly all nations of the western industrialized world.)

“We at the United Nations applaud…your strong stand against intolerance and extremism… your fight against racism, in general, and more particularly against anti-Semitism.

…hunger and economic hardship threaten social stability and have led to intolerance and xenophobia [suspicion of other peoples and cultures].

http://www.prisonplanet.com/un-and-adl-want-global-hate-crimes-laws.html

And I do not wish to cover it because it's not really in keeping with where I'm going with this show, which I have defined as being uplifting for everyone.

But it's topical because the ADL has had success getting a hate bill passed in the United States. (It's a Pyrrhic victory because Israel's involvement in 9-11 caused the United States to cease to exist. So their hard-won zombie jurisdiction disappeared. Can't win for losin'.)

But real quick: I will tell you that within the occultic, satanic variant of Judaism is a body of laws that specifies how Gentiles are to interact with Jews. Talmudic law provides for a two-tiered system of law, one for Jews and another for Gentiles. I cannot immediately find the specific "statute," but I can say that it is against Talmudic law for a Gentile to speak ill of a Jew. There is a punishment for that behavior.

Orthodox Jews will always work through the civil authority of their host nation. They will immediately begin attempting to "translate" Talmudic law and insert it into the statutes of the host nation. For example, the prohibition that a Gentile never speak ill of a Jew will be translated into a form that is appropriate for the system of law of the host nation. It will be called, for example, a "hate law," whose purpose is to prevent hating people of various oppressed groups, such as blacks and homosexuals and transgendered people and, uh, Jews!!!

The purpose of the hate legislation has absolutely nothing to do with any group other than Jews. That's just the "entry vehicle" for the insertion of Talmudic Law into your nation's legal system. The whole purpose of "hate speech" laws is to prevent the public discussion of the illness called Orthodox Judaism and the crimes of its practitioners. (An Orthodox Jew taking umbrage at hate speech is supremely hypocritical, considering that Orthodox Judaism is predicated upon hatred as an energy source. It is the entire organizing principle of that religion. Hatred is alien to non-earth-power religions. There is no one more hateful and envious and begrudging in this world that an Orthodox Jew. I assure you that a study of Orthodox Judaism will make you sick to your stomach.)

And this is precisely why a Jew should never be permitted to practice law: One cannot know any particular Jew's adherence to Talmudic Law (which is racist and supremacist and thoroughly disgusting) and therefore one cannot know if any particular Jew will uphold or subvert the dominant system of law.

Talmudic Law is a legal system of aborigines, essentially. It's caveman law. Under no circumstances do you want Talmudic Law polluting your legal system. And that is precisely what you have when you allow a Hive Mind intelligence agency like the ADL to lay its eggs in your legal system.

Israel's involvement in 9-11 grants me license to contemplate these ideas, by the way. The seeds of 9-11 can be found deep within various earth-power religions, including Judaism. That "religion" is in moral receivership to decent humanity until the original theological error can be identified and isolated.

Until such time, the thoughts of a Jew are not at all relevant and they are to remain silent on the matter.

I'm still in the running.